Design of Electricity Price Package Based on Dual Game Theory and User Choice Behavior

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0198.2026.01.020

Abstract

Abstract: In order to enhance the interaction between enthusiasm electricity users and the power grid, and meet the electricity needs of different users, a pricing package design method based on dual game theory and user choice behavior is proposed. Firstly, a dual game theory framework for designing electricity pricing packages is established, which covers two levels of games: one is non cooperative games between power sales companies, and the other is master-slave games between power sales companies and electricity users. Then, a pricing package decision model for participants in the power market is constructed. Finally, the designed electricity price package model is solved through iterative loop nesting. The results of the calculation examples show that the electricity price package design method proposed in this paper can take into account the interests of both power sales companies and power users, which is conducive to reducing the purchase and sale prices of power for power sales companies, improving the satisfaction of power users, and achieving a win-win situation for both the sellers and users.

Key words: electricity price package, master-slave game, non cooperative game, demand response, satisfaction with electricity consumption

CLC Number:

F426

XIAO Bai, YANG Ning, SUN Lingwen, WANG Ling, SUN Heyang. Design of Electricity Price Package Based on Dual Game Theory and User Choice Behavior[J]. Hunan Electric Power, 2026, 46(1): 150-156.

References

[1] 王天航,王艺博,尹立敏,等. 两级电力市场环境下考虑条件风险价值的新能源场站最优售电模型[J]. 电力自动化设备,2023,43(5):113-120.
[2] 王雪林,钟海旺.新型电力系统背景下抽水蓄能和新型储能协同发展研究[J]. 全球能源互联网,2024,7(4):363-371.
[3] 汤奕,易俊,薛峰.“双碳”目标下的新型电力系统规划与运行[J].全球能源互联网,2024,7(3):241-242.
[4] 张智,王韵楚,林振智,等. 基于套餐隐式评分与用户画像的电力套餐推荐方法[J]. 电力系统自动化,2023,47(4):91-101.
[5] LUO F J,RANZI G,WANG X B,et al.Social information filtering-based electricity retail plan recommender system for smart grid end users[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid,2019,10(1):95-104.
[6] YANG J J,ZHAO J H,WEN F S,et al.A model of customizing electricity retail prices based on load profile clustering analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid,2019,10(3):3374-3386.
[7] 骆钊,张涛,高泽勇,等. 基于用户特征聚类的综合能源套餐推荐方法[J]. 电力需求侧管理,2023,25(6):76-81.
[8] 马愿谦,李启源,陈汉忠,等. 基于BLAP聚类和多粒度犹豫模糊集的售电套餐推荐方法[J]. 电力系统自动化,2023,47(1):96-104.
[9] CHARWAND M,GITIZADEH M.Risk-based procurement strategy for electricity retailers:different scenario-based methods[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2020, 67(1):141-151.
[10] 董海艳,陈杰,贾清泉,等. 考虑敏感用户需求的电能质量分级与购售电策略[J]. 电力自动化设备,2022,42(2):201-209.
[11] 孙毅,顾玮,李彬,等. 面向售电侧改革的用户分层聚类与套餐推荐方法[J]. 电网技术,2018,42(2):447-454.
[12] 詹祥澎,杨军,王昕妍,等. 考虑实时市场联动的电力零售商鲁棒定价策略[J]. 电网技术,2022,46(6):2141-2153.
[13] 董立志,刘皓明,周辉,等. 基于Stackelberg博弈的售电侧放开环境下电能质量定价方法[J]. 电力需求侧管理,2020,22(2):28-33.
[14] 刘连光,潘明明,田世明,等. 考虑源网荷多元主体的售电竞争非合作博弈方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2017,37(6):1618-1626.
[15] 田海青,郭金辉,周瑜,等. 基于合作博弈模型的新能源参与电力交易的调控策略[J]. 现代电力,2022,39(6):640-648.
[16] 向悦萍,杨健维,臧天磊,等. 计及电能质量的电力市场多主体博弈模型[J]. 电网技术,2020,44(9):3383-3394.
[17] 赵琛,张少华. 考虑用户切换行为的电力零售市场博弈模型[J]. 电力自动化设备,2020,40(2):162-170.
[18] 潘虹锦,高红均,杨艳红,等. 基于主从博弈的售电商多元零售套餐设计与多级市场购电策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2022,42(13):4785-4799.
[19] 林国营,卢世祥,郭昆健,等.基于主从博弈的电网公司需求响应补贴定价机制[J].电力系统自动化,2020,44(10):59-67.
[20] 范峻伟,朱继忠,史普鑫,等. 一种基于合作博弈的深度调峰补偿策略[J]. 全球能源互联网,2022,5(5):419-428.
[21] 许文哲,方八零,张淇菲,等. 基于阶段分时电价响应的电动汽车充电负荷优化策略[J]. 湖南电力,2024,44(1):94-100.
[22] 张岭乔,周正成,沈莎莎,等. 考虑调节成本的负荷聚合商策略性报价及其尖峰市场出清优化[J]. 湖南电力,2023,43(4):4-31.
[23] 朱玥荣,张楠,肖云鹏,等. 基于卖方灵活合同的绿电与绿证中长期联合交易机制及其均衡分析[J]. 全球能源互联网,2023,6(4):398-405.
[24] 李姚旺,张宁,杜尔顺,等. 基于碳排放流的电力系统低碳需求响应机制研究及效益分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2022,42(8):2830-2841.
[25] 李鹏,吴迪凡,李雨薇,等. 基于综合需求响应和主从博弈的多微网综合能源系统优化调度策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2021,41(4):1307-1321.