湖南电力 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 66-75.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0198.2026.05.009

• 新能源发展与应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

二次型Boost变换器的PI+MPC控制策略研究

杨恩权1, 龚柄宽1, 臧堃1, 崔崇雨1, 杨帆2   

  1. 1.西藏农牧大学清洁能源与电气工程学院,西藏 林芝 860000;
    2.国网西藏电力有限公司林芝供电公司,西藏 林芝 860000
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-14 修回日期:2026-06-15 出版日期:2026-10-25 发布日期:2026-11-06
  • 作者简介:杨恩权(2002),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为电力系统运行与控制。
  • 基金资助:
    西藏自治区自然科学基金项目 (XZ202401ZR0060); 西藏自治区科技计划(基地与人才计划)项目(XZ202401JD0005); 西藏农牧大学青年科学基金(NYQNZR2025-02)

Research on PI+MPC Control Strategy for Quadratic Boost Converter

YANG Enquan1, GONG Bingkuan1, ZANG Kun1, CUI Chongyu1, YANG Fan2   

  1. 1. College of Clean Energy and Electrical Engineering, Xizang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000, China;
    2. State Grid Nyingchi Power Supply Company, Nyingchi 860000, China
  • Received:2026-05-14 Revised:2026-06-15 Online:2026-10-25 Published:2026-11-06

摘要: 针对二次型Boost变换器在高增益运行条件下存在的动态过程复杂、鲁棒性不足等问题,提出一种外环比例-积分(proportional-integral,PI)与内环模型预测控制(model predictive control,MPC)相结合的复合控制策略。在相同主电路模型和参数设置条件下,针对输入电压小幅随机波动,分别对单闭环PI、双闭环PI和PI+MPC三种控制方案进行不同扰动工况下的仿真。无扰动工况下,三种控制方式均可实现基本稳压;在输入电压暂降扰动工况下,PI+MPC控制仍能恢复至参考值附近,而单闭环PI最低输出电压约为1.88 V,恢复后难以重新建立稳定输出;在强扰动工况下,相比双闭环PI控制,PI+MPC控制的恢复时间缩短约12.7%,电压跌落幅值降低约54.3%,且稳态阶段局部波动峰值降幅约为11.3%。结果验证了所提PI+MPC复合控制策略在提升二次型Boost变换器动态响应性能、抗扰能力及综合调节能力方面的有效性。

关键词: 二次型Boost变换器, PI+MPC控制, 性能对比

Abstract: To address the issues of complex dynamic processes and insufficient robustness of the quadratic Boost converter under high-gain operating conditions, a composite control strategy combining an outer-loop PI controller with an inner-loop model predictive controller is proposed. Under the same main-circuit model and parameter settings, three control schemes, namely single-loop PI, dual-loop PI, and PI+MPC, are simulated and compared under different disturbance conditions. The results show that all three methods can achieve basic voltage regulation under no-disturbance conditions. Under input-voltage sag disturbance, the PI+MPC control can still recover to the reference value, whereas the minimum output voltage of the single-loop PI scheme drops to merely about 1.88 V and fails to re-establish stable output after recovery. Under strong-disturbance conditions, compared with dual-loop PI control, the proposed PI+MPC control shortens the recovery time by approximately 12.7%, reduces the voltage sag magnitude by 54.3%, and decreases the peak-to-peak value of local steady-state fluctuations by 11.3%. The results verify the effectiveness of the proposed PI+MPC composite control strategy in improving the dynamic response, disturbance rejection capability, and overall regulation performance of the quadratic Boost converter.

Key words: quadratic boost converter, PI+MPC control, performance comparison

中图分类号: